The Economist explains

What is “Finlandisation”?

An unpleasant cold-war arrangement is contemplated for Ukraine

|4 min read

THE CRISIS over Ukraine has pushed desperate officials in Western capitals to seek a diplomatic way to avert a Russian invasion. On his way to a meeting with Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, in Moscow, Emmanuel Macron, his French counterpart, was asked about one possible solution: “Finlandisation”, a reference to Finland’s officially neutral status during the cold war. It was “one model on the table”, acknowledged Mr Macron, but he insisted diplomats would have to invent something new. The news sparked anger in Ukraine and also in Finland, where the experience is not remembered fondly. How did “Finlandisation” work in practice, and how might a similar status be applied to Ukraine?

Ukrainian drone operator works to correct artillery fire in the city of Bahkmut.

How drones and video-game techniques are coming together in Ukraine’s war

The idea of the body count evolves

Blue sky, mountainous landscape in the background, with a rope bridge over the Indus River. A motocyclist is crossing the bridge.

Why are India and Pakistan fighting over water?

After terror attacks India has suspended a water-sharing treaty 


A destroyed Russian tank sits on a roadside near the town of Sudzha, Ukraine

How will mines dropped by drones change warfare?

They make attacks on tanks more precise and troops easier to trap


What do Greenlanders think of being bought?

Donald Trump’s desire for Greenland, and a shabby visit by his son, reignite the independence debate

What would Donald Trump gain from seizing the Panama Canal?

The president-elect claims the crossing is controlled by China and rips off American consumers

Where does Santa come from?

How a miracle-working Greek bishop, Dutch folk figure and early New York icon became the ubiquitous symbol of Christmas