The Nobel prize in economics rewards advances in auction theory
For the third time since 2007, it goes to designers of market mechanisms

IN 1991 ALVIN ROTH, who in 2012 would share the Nobel prize for economics, was asked how the discipline might change over the century to come. “In the long term”, he wrote, “the real test of our success will be not merely how well we understand the general principles which govern economic interactions, but how well we can bring this knowledge to bear on practical questions of microeconomic engineering.” Sweden’s Royal Academy of Science seems to agree. On October 12th it gave this year’s Nobel prize to Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson, both of Stanford University, for their work on auction theory and design. Their work epitomises economics as engineering.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Winning bids”
Finance & economics
October 17th 2020- The Nobel prize in economics rewards advances in auction theory
- Can China’s reported growth be trusted?
- Wall Street says it is braced for losses. Now what?
- Why securing debt forgiveness for poor countries is so hard
- Low interest rates leave savers with few good options
- The IMF predicts that the world economy will suffer from “long covid”
- The tale of Iran’s stockmarket bubble is familiar—but also strange

From the October 17th 2020 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Want to be a good explorer? Study economics
The battle to reduce risk has shaped centuries of ventures

Jane Street is chucked out of India. Other firms should be nervous
Around the world, marketmakers now face extra scrutiny

Japan has been hit by investing fever
Will old folk catch the bug?
Don’t invest through the rearview mirror
Markets are supposed to look forward; plenty of investors look back instead
Trump’s trade deals try a creative way to hobble China
To appease the world’s biggest market, countries must anger the world’s biggest trader
The great dealmaker is conspicuously short of trade deals
Donald Trump issues threats—and grants deadline extensions