The Nobel prize in economics celebrates an empirical revolution
David Card shares this year’s award with Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens

A “CREDIBILITY REVOLUTION” has transformed economics since the 1990s. Before that, theory ruled the roost and empirical work was a poor second cousin. “Hardly anyone takes data analysis seriously,” declared Edward Leamer of the University of California, Los Angeles, in a paper published in 1983. Yet within a decade, new and innovative work had altered the course of the profession, such that the lion’s share of notable research today is empirical. For enabling this transition David Card of the University of California at Berkeley shares this year’s economics Nobel prize, awarded on October 11th, with Joshua Angrist of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Guido Imbens of Stanford University.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Instrumental research”
Finance & economics
October 16th 2021- Wages are surging across the rich world
- Germany’s workers are in the strongest position in 30 years
- The IMF decides to keep its boss
- Another upward force on American inflation: the housing boom
- A new study finds that dirty money remains easy to hide
- Chinese companies suffer an intense cash crunch in offshore bond markets
- Credit-card firms are becoming reluctant regulators of the web
- How to think about the unstoppable rise of index funds
- The Nobel prize in economics celebrates an empirical revolution

From the October 16th 2021 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Want to be a good explorer? Study economics
The battle to reduce risk has shaped centuries of ventures

Jane Street is chucked out of India. Other firms should be nervous
Around the world, marketmakers now face extra scrutiny

Japan has been hit by investing fever
Will old folk catch the bug?
Don’t invest through the rearview mirror
Markets are supposed to look forward; plenty of investors look back instead
Trump’s trade deals try a creative way to hobble China
To appease the world’s biggest market, countries must anger the world’s biggest trader
The great dealmaker is conspicuously short of trade deals
Donald Trump issues threats—and grants deadline extensions