United States | Lexington

Merrick Garland and his critics

The attorney-general needs to bolster the Department of Justice’s defences against Trumpism

|5 min read

IT IS HARD to pinpoint a moment at which the Republicans abandoned democratic norms for the end-justifies-the-means power politics that connects Mitch McConnell’s Senate leadership to Donald Trump’s demagoguery. Yet Mr McConnell’s refusal in March 2016 to hold confirmation hearings for Merrick Garland, an appeals-court judge nominated by Barack Obama to the Supreme Court bench, is a top contender. Though both parties had hitherto been culpable of eroding the Senate’s traditions of compromise and restraint, Mr McConnell’s ploy raised the damage to a new level. It suggested he would press for maximum partisan advantage at every opportunity, whatever the institutional cost.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Merrick Garland and his critics”

Big tech’s supersized ambitions

From the January 22nd 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition
President Trump and Pam Bondi hold a press conference

Jeffrey Epstein is still causing trouble for Donald Trump

His administration cannot shake rumours of a cover-up—in part because MAGA types enthusiastically endorsed it

What went wrong in the Texas floods?

DOGE may not have been to blame but local politicians have a case to answer


Young man with strong body showing back muscles

American men are hungry for injectable testosterone

A legion of new health clinics are serving it up


Trump embarrasses the Pentagon with a U-turn on Ukraine

His decision to resume arms shipments is a victory for common sense—while it lasts

ICE’s big payday makes mass deportation possible

What the controversial agency will do with even more funding