United States | Working for it

How the Trump administration is reshaping Medicaid

Republican-led states are using waivers to impose work requirements for the first time ever

|WASHINGTON, DC|3 min read

AMERICAN lawmakers are acutely afraid of rewarding the loafing poor. For that reason, Congress has set strict work requirements on federal food assistance and cash welfare. The Trump administration is now steadily doing the same for Medicaid, as America’s health-insurance programme for the poor is known. On January 11th the Centres of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a memo inviting states to apply for waivers that would include “work and community engagement requirements” on the theory that this would both improve health and help families “rise out of poverty and attain independence”. Ten states, all Republican-led, quickly took up the offer. Michigan, another Republican-controlled state, has contemplated a waiver of its own which would impose some of the strictest work requirements yet seen. The impetus is less financial than moral—an attempt to sort the deserving poor from the chaff.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Will work for health care”

Gaza: There is a better way

From the May 19th 2018 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition
President Trump and Pam Bondi hold a press conference

Jeffrey Epstein is still causing trouble for Donald Trump

His administration cannot shake rumours of a cover-up—in part because MAGA types enthusiastically endorsed it

What went wrong in the Texas floods?

DOGE may not have been to blame but local politicians have a case to answer


Young man with strong body showing back muscles

American men are hungry for injectable testosterone

A legion of new health clinics are serving it up


Trump embarrasses the Pentagon with a U-turn on Ukraine

His decision to resume arms shipments is a victory for common sense—while it lasts

ICE’s big payday makes mass deportation possible

What the controversial agency will do with even more funding