Fighting in the Sahel has forced 1.7m people from their homes
Jihadists are only partly to blame
WESTERN GOVERNMENTS have long debated whether the costs of intervening in dangerous parts of the world exceed the risks. In February the United States signed a peace deal with the Taliban in Afghanistan. But just as America extricates itself from one conflict, a power vacuum in Africa’s Sahel may drag it into another.
This article appeared in the Graphic detail section of the print edition under the headline “The next Afghanistan?”
From the June 20th 2020 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Russia’s summer Ukraine offensive looks like its deadliest yet
Our analysis of what it has cost both sides
Why was the flooding in Texas so deadly?
A mixture of geography, catastrophic rainfall and a lack of preparedness
Ten charts to explain Trump’s big, beautiful bill
The overhaul of taxation and spending spells trouble for America
Iran has come back online—for now
The regime has a long history of cutting access to the internet
Mapping Iran’s nuclear programme
American and Israeli strikes have done clear damage, but uncertainties remain about what has survived
How often do ceasefires in the Middle East work?
Donald Trump says he expects the Iran-Israel truce to last forever. Our analysis of more than 2,000 truces suggests that’s optimistic