Fact-checkers forecast which dodgy claims will do most damage
How to distinguish between weapons-grade disinformation and everyday codswallop
Correcting the gigabytes of digital gibberish that circulate at high speed online is a never-ending task. YouTube removed more than half a million channels last year for broadcasting misinformation. Facebook and Instagram deleted 27m falsehoods about covid-19 at the height of the pandemic. The doughty fact-checking organisations that try to keep the internet honest face more claims than they can handle. How should they prioritise?
Explore more
This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline “The lie-detectors”
From the May 17th 2025 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
The 19th century is a terrible guide to modern statecraft
A world carved up between Presidents Trump, Xi and Putin would be unstable and unsafe
Putin’s radioactive chokehold on the world
The Kremlin dominates the cross-border business of nuclear fuel and technology
How South Africa could harness Donald Trump’s wrath
Talk of “white genocide” is baseless. But some American pressure could be helpful
Sex work in the gig economy
Sweden is banning OnlyFans content as the lines around sex work blur
Feckless Europe accepts Trump’s Lone Ranger diplomacy
It is meekly welcoming the new sheriff’s vigilante justice