Cronyism is a problem. But not always an economic one
Research on the topic is surprisingly nuanced

When economists explain the financial crisis that hit the “tiger economies” of Indonesia, Malaysia and South Korea, among others, in 1997, some reach for the term “crony capitalism”. A cosy relationship between governments and firms distorted markets. The ensuing currency crises can be blamed on close ties between businesses, banks and politicians, rather than on panicky investors. Companies took excessive risks, safe in the knowledge that economic institutions were designed for their benefit. It was because of this rot that everything came tumbling down.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Everyone has their price”
Finance & economics
December 7th 2024- How China will strike back at Trump
- MAGA types have a point on debanking
- France is not alone in its fiscal woes
- Russia’s plunging currency spells trouble for its war effort
- How sports gambling became ubiquitous
- Xi Jinping’s campaign against gambling is a failure
- The hidden cost of Chinese loans
- Cronyism is a problem. But not always an economic one

From the December 7th 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Want to be a good explorer? Study economics
The battle to reduce risk has shaped centuries of ventures

Jane Street is chucked out of India. Other firms should be nervous
Around the world, marketmakers now face extra scrutiny

Japan has been hit by investing fever
Will old folk catch the bug?
Don’t invest through the rearview mirror
Markets are supposed to look forward; plenty of investors look back instead
Trump’s trade deals try a creative way to hobble China
To appease the world’s biggest market, countries must anger the world’s biggest trader
The great dealmaker is conspicuously short of trade deals
Donald Trump issues threats—and grants deadline extensions